The Comprehensive Examination (also referred to as Departmental Examination) must be completed by all doctoral students. The examination consists of two mandatory components:
- An oral examination focused on clinical competency
- A written review paper
A pass on both components is required for you to continue on in the program.
|Nov 1||Comprehensive Examination Research Paper Requirement Topic Proposal Form|
|Dec 15||Research Paper Outline for Supervisor Feedback|
|May 7||Oral Clinical Competency Exam|
|June 4||Oral Clinical Competency Reexamination|
|July 1 (or next business day)||Review Paper Deadline|
|Oct 16||Review Paper Resubmission|
Clinical Competency Oral Examination
The purpose of the oral examination is to provide students with the ability to apply their knowledge of case conceptualization, assessment, treatment, and ethics to a clinical case. Questions pertaining to these issues, including case descriptions, will be provided by members of the clinical comprehensive committee. During the one-hour examination, students will be examined by two members of the Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science. The committee may include any full or associate member of the department, but will exclude the Graduate Chair in the case of an appeal. Questions will fall into four broad areas: case conceptualization, assessment, clinical intervention, and ethical and diversity issues. Students will be asked specific questions based on 1) their personal clinical experience (e.g., as part of their practicum and other professional training) and 2) clinical descriptions provided to them during the examination.
Research Paper Requirement
To satisfy the research component of the Comprehensive Requirement, students will write a substantive review paper on a topic relevant to clinical psychology. The purpose of this component is to demonstrate breadth of knowledge in clinical psychology. Therefore, the topic of the paper must not be the same topic as the doctoral dissertation or the Master’s thesis, but may be related to the student’s research program.
To maintain the integrity of the Comprehensive Examination process, faculty will not be involved in the student's research paper beyond reviewing the paper outline. Students are welcome to submit a draft outline to their supervisors for feedback no later than Dec 15, 2017.
Proposal: The COMPS Research Paper Requirement Topic Proposal Form must be submitted for approval by November 1 of the PhD2 year. This form includes abstracts from the Master’s Thesis and Doctoral dissertation proposal, as well as a 1-page proposal on the topic of your Comprehensive Requirement Research Paper Requirement. The Program Coordinator will decide if the topic is sufficiently different from previous or future theses. In addition, this paper cannot serve as a chapter in the student’s dissertation.
Review Paper: Students should write the review paper (30-50 pages) according to the most recent author guidelines for Clinical Psychology Review and should browse the latest issues of the journal for examples of how to prepare and format the paper. The purpose of this paper is to produce a qualitative and, or, quantitative (e.g. meta-analysis) literature and/or theoretical review on a topic in the student’s broad area of study. The topic should be broad enough that students are able to find a sufficient number of published papers to support the review. However, it should be focused enough that the paper has depth and students are able to thoughtfully explore the methodological and theoretical issues raised by the topic. The paper should not be a simple description of studies in the area; it should make a theoretical and/or methodological contribution to the literature. Students should submit an electronic copy of their paper to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Evaluation: Evaluation is based on a review by the Examination Committee (comprised of GD-PCS faculty members) who will assign a "Pass" or "Fail" grade. A passing paper should propose an interesting and important question to the field of clinical psychology, be comprehensive in its review, and summarize the implications of the research area while advancing theory and/or methodology in the topic area.