John M. Kennedy
Department of Psychology
Division of Life Sciences
Scarborough Campus
University of Toronto
1. Child's hand - an adult's mind reporting! This is what it is like to be asking inexperienced blind "sketchers" to tell us what is happening as they try to draw for the first time. 2. Betty, a teenager from Toronto, reported drawing being satisfactory, despite being blind. 3. Millar recommends teaching the blind to draw. 4. Pat drew duck's feet successfully. 5. So - with these influences, a study was initiated with blind adults from BOOST, asking them to draw. A. First, drawing a hand - 4 drew "single-line" digits and 9 drew digits by lines showing occluding bounds. B. Second, digits overlapping, like an X. Most drew an X, or in "X-ray style" if they drew occluding bounds. To show which digit is "on top" - 5 said "not sure how to do this", and 4 had some discussion, which lead Dee, May & Ray to leave out the occluded lines. (Ann too, but she is late blind, and experienced with pictures). 6. A container - a glass: 3 said "there's more than one way" at the outset and 5 eventually drew the glass in more than one way. Note especially Ray - lines thinning to show receding surfaces Joan - leaving out a line at the top of the glass to show the brim surrounds an opening. Dee - drew a flat base. In a second drawing she added an ellipse at the top to show the roundedness. Lys - initially drew a wavy line for the front of the glass, and no sides. On request, she drew the sides (occluding bounds). Note - Josiane Carson-Pargue describes analysis into parts, with individual shapes, as "distintegration", and showing some parts more completely as "emphasis". Pau, Pat and May - provided CURVED sides, and a flat base. This is like a pun - one shape showing two things. Note: - the use of L junctions at the base of the glass. 7A. Boost - continued - Table drawins. (N.B. a table is in 3-D; a picture is 2-D but has "multidimensional" possibilities e.g. the diagonal could be given a special use). Dot, Ray - drew a table in more than one way and mentioned a vantage point. Also 4 drew an inverted U shape. Also more than one drew a rectangle with 4 appendages near the corners (which can be a product of 2 systems, one with no vantage point, or as in Ray's case, with a vantage point). B. Completing a trapezoid or rhomboid. Most said this table top is an odd shape. Ray took it be a product of "how it looks". The principles evident are SHAPE SIMILARITY, CONNECTIONS AT PROPER JUNCTIONS, OUTLINE - but not ANGLES being preserved across junctions, or being governed by vantage point effects. 8. Volunteered drawings: 8 Ss: bath tub Lys, includes CONCAVE CORNER), dog (Joan, principle evident that SOME REFERENTS are above a BAR or CRITERION FOR SATISFACTION), princess at wheel (Pat, showing 2 principles - stick figure person, and LINE OF MOTION). 9. TRACY (N.Y.): Principles evident includes - "Units" for Mickey Mouse. Stereotypical drawings (repeatable). Comments indicate CYCLIC procedure i.e. execute - compare - revise execution-practice. 10. Heller - other recognizable drawings. 11. Pring - highly recognizable drawins from Sally (London, U.K.) 12. Katz - some highly recognizable drawins, despite remarkably unfavourable comments from Katz. 13. Wally used "teach by rote" techniques, but informally he reports the blind can draw before he teaches them. His drawins are often technical, excellent. 14. Millar - blind children (U.K.) can draw successfully. 15. Overall - drawins by the blind show a definite, recognizable form, at what one might informally call an "intermediate" level at times, and many similarities with young sighted children at times (e.g. perhaps 4-5 year olds). An occasional blind person draws like a 7- 8 year old. A few blind people show a level of skill that may rival most ordinary sighted adults.
| Scarborough College | Table of Contents | Figure 1.1 |
This page was designed and is maintained by William Barek, CITD - Bladen Library.
E-mail:
barek@macpost.scar.utoronto.ca