|
|
|
Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensorimotor Integration Lab |
|
|
|
|
Welcome
to the CoNSens Lab! |
|
|
|
|
In the CoNSens lab we study the neural and cognitive bases of attention
and perception of space and of objects. An important approach to
understanding these mechanisms is to look at what function they serve in the
context of the brain’s sensory inputs and motor outputs, so its sensorimotor processes, and to compare its
performances to optimized models. For our research we use large visual field presentations and 3D
displays, we record behavioural and neural responses
through multiple techniques (e.g., eye-tracking, brain imaging, and 3-D
positioning of the body, and its parts, in space), and we use computer
simulations such as neural networks. The CoNSens lab is part of the Centre for Cognition in
Action, an interdisciplinary initiative within the Department of Life
Sciences at UTSC that aims at examining how human cognitive processes operate
in realistic environmental settings, while still maintaining rigorous
experimental control over the environment. Currently the centre comprises
experimental psychology labs and facilities for large-scale computer
simulations of cognitive processes. For 2006 a research clinic for
outpatients and an EEG-lab are planned. |
|
|
Selected research interests of the
CoNSens Lab |
|||
|
Sensorimotor integration for spatial processes Spatial perception
includes perceiving the spatial relationship of objects relative to our body
as well as spatial relationships of objects relative to each other. For these
processes the brain integrates multiple sources of sensory information
including vision, audition, proprioception and many others. We a particularly
interested in the following functions: Spatial
perception across saccadic eye movements. When we move our eyes, the image on our retinas see the world as jumping
around. Why do we perceive the world as being stable nevertheless? How do we
integrate visual information across eye movements? We have recently shown
that the brain follows optimal strategies for these processes. Strangely, as
a result we are blind for certain perceptual events.
E.g., we cannot see our own eye movements in the
mirror…
… and sometimes we
perceive movements of object in space as nonlinearly distorted and contracted. Processing
of 3D object sizes for action and perception. We use stereo displays and 3D recordings of manual
grasping movements to understand the optimization principles underlying
action and perception. Perceptual
properties of the attentional bias. In
many spatial and/or attentional tasks normal participants show subtle
asymmetries in favour of the left visual field
and/or the left part of space. In contrast, lesions of the right brain often
lead to severe neuropsychological deficits such as spatial neglect. These
data suggest that the right cortical hemisphere is dominant for spatial and
attentional tasks. However, which functions and underlying neural mechanisms
are exactly involved? Currently we explore which visual and non-visual
mechanisms are associated with the attentional bias. |
|||
|
Feature-based
attention and object perception Visual
exploration involves shifts of attention to enhance perception – not
only shifts between spatial locations but also to non-spatial features, such
as colour, regardless of object locations. This feature-based attention is
known to support perception of low level features. Does it also help with
more complex forms of perception associated with high-level visual areas? Sensory and attentional mechanisms of
the lateral occipital area LO. We have recently shown that the high-level object
area LO exhibits significant effects of attention.
Feature-based attention and contour
integration. Since higher-level areas are activated as a function of attention the
question arises whether this results from increases in neural inputs or
whether attention changes processing within these areas? Quite surprisingly,
recent studies suggest that attention has little effect on high-level
perception itself. To explore this further we are using dual-task paradigms
to probe whether feature-based attention improves perception of simple
objects such as loops outside the attentional focus.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This Web
Page is maintained by niemeier@utsc.utoronto.ca
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||