The Comprehensive Examination (also referred to as Departmental Examination) must be completed by all doctoral students. The examination consists of two mandatory components:
- An oral examination focused on clinical competency
- A written review paper.
A pass on both components is required for you to continue on to Ph.D. candidacy.
|Nov 1||Comprehensive Examination Research Paper Requirement Topic Proposal Form|
|Dec 19||Research Paper Outline for Supervisor Feedback|
|May 1||Oral Clinical Competency Exam|
|May 15||Oral Clinical Competency Reexamination|
|July 1||Review Paper Deadline|
|Aug 21||Review Paper Resubmission|
Clinical Competency Oral Examination
The purpose of the oral examination is to provide students with the ability to apply their knowledge of case conceptualization, assessment, treatment, and ethics to a clinical case. Questions pertaining to these issues, including case descriptions, will be written by members of the clinical comprehensive committee. During the one-hour exam, students will be questioned by two members of GDPCS. The committee may include any full or associate member of GDPCS, but will exclude the Graduate Chair in the case of an appeal. Questions will fall into four broad areas: case conceptualization, assessment, clinical intervention, and ethical and diversity issues. Students will be asked specific questions based on 1) their personal clinical experience and 2) clinical descriptions provided to them during the exam.
Exam content: The exam will include questions often proposed by the College of Psychologists of Ontario (CPO) Oral Examination for registration as a psychologist, as well as questions typically seen on interviews for practicum and internship. Students should have an available working knowledge of their assessment and treatment experience; they should be well versed in the CPO Standards of Professional Conduct, Canadian Psychological Association Practice Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services, and the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. Students will be asked approximately 4-5 primary questions, with each answer spanning 15-20 minutes (including any follow-up questions by the committee).
Timing of Exam: The exam will be held at UTSC and will be given to all students on the same date in May of the PhD1 year. Students will be assigned to one of two timeslots and will be notified via email of their assigned time and examining committee. Students are expected to attend the examination as scheduled. Only under extenuating circumstances (with appropriate documentation) will the Department consider scheduling a make-up examination.
Criteria for Pass: A student who successfully passes the oral examination will be able to (a) identify a theory of case conceptualization and accurately apply it to a case, (b) accurately identify the appropriate assessment measures and/or procedures, (c) provide an exhaustive list of potential diagnoses and identify the appropriate steps for making the differentials, (d) describe appropriate, evidence-based treatment options with associated therapeutic techniques (e) provide an exhaustive list of ethical issues raised by the case and identify the appropriate strategies for addressing these issues, with reference to relevant legislation and standards of practice, and (f) show insight in identifying personal, cultural, or diversity issues raised by a case, as well as how to address these in practice. The two-person committee will decide by consensus whether the student passes. Students will receive a letter from the Graduate Chair notifying them of their results no later than 1 week post examination.
Procedure for Fail: Students who fail the oral examination will be provided with detailed written feedback regarding the nature of the weaknesses by the examining committee. Students will have 2 days to discuss the feedback with the committee. If students still have questions or are unclear, they can seek counsel from the Program Coordinator (alternately, the Chair, if the student was examined by the Program Coordinator). The student will then have the opportunity to re-take the exam the following week with a new committee. Students who fail the second examination attempt should consult the School of Graduate Studies’ Academic Appeals Policy. If after the appeals process and second examination attempts result in an exam failure notwithstanding, the student will no longer be eligible to continue in the Ph.D. program.
Research Paper Requirement
To satisfy the research component of the Comprehensive Requirement, students will write a substantive review paper on a topic relevant to clinical psychology. The purpose of this component is to demonstrate breadth of knowledge in clinical psychology. Therefore, the topic of the paper must not be the same topic as the doctoral dissertation or the Master’s thesis, but may be related to the student’s research program.
To maintain the integrity of the Comprehensive Examination process, faculty will not be involved in the student's research paper beyond reviewing the paper outline. Students are welcome to submit a draft outline to their supervisors for feedback no later than Dec 19, 2016.
Proposal: The COMPS Research Paper Requirement Topic Proposal Form must be submitted for approval by November 1 of the PhD2 year. This form includes abstracts from the Master’s Thesis and Doctoral dissertation proposal, as well as a 1-page proposal on the topic of your Comprehensive Requirement Research Paper Requirement. The Program Coordinator will decide if the topic is sufficiently different from previous or future theses. In addition, this paper cannot serve as a chapter in the student’s dissertation.
Students are required to suggest names of two Associate Members whom the department may contact to serve as reviewers for the paper.
Review Paper: Students should write the review paper (30-50 pages) according to the most recent author guidelines for Clinical Psychology Review and should browse the latest issues of the journal for examples of how to prepare and format the paper. The purpose of this paper is to produce a literature and/or theoretical review on a topic in the student’s broad area of study. The topic should be broad enough that students are able to find a sufficient amount of published papers to support the review. However, it should be focused enough that the paper has depth and students are able to thoughtfully explore the methodological and theoretical issues raised by the topic. The paper should not be a simple description of studies in the area; it should make a theoretical and/or methodological contribution to the literature.
Criteria for Pass: Evaluation is based on review by your doctoral supervisory committee (with feedback from the Associate Members) who will assign a “Pass” or “Fail” grade. Once again, this committee will exclude the Graduate Chair in the case of an appeal. A passing paper should propose an interesting and important question to the field of clinical psychology, be comprehensive in its review, and summarize the implications of the research area while advancing theory and/or methodology in the topic area.
Procedure for Fail: Students who receive a “Fail” grade have one opportunity to revise their paper according to the comments of the reviewing faculty. Students have up to one week to seek clarity/guidance from the reviewing faculty regarding their revisions. The revised paper must be submitted for review to the Program Coordinator (alternately, the Chair, if the student is supervised by the Program Coordinator) within one month of receiving the graded paper. The Program Coordinator or Chair will have the final decision as to whether the student has adequately addressed the faculty comments. Students who receive a “Fail” on their second attempt should consult the School of Graduate Studies’ Academic Appeals Policy. If after the appeals process and second examination attempts result in an exam failure notwithstanding, the student will no longer be eligible to continue in the Ph.D. program.